Gender Diversity and Organizational Performance: An Empirical Study of Leadership Representation in Nepal and South Asia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/qhnch980Keywords:
Gender Diversity, Leadership Representation, Organizational Performance, Nepal, South Asia, Upper Echelons TheoryAbstract
Gender diversity in leadership has emerged as a pivotal component of effective management and sustainable organizational development, particularly within developing economies such as Nepal and the broader South Asian region. This empirical study investigates the relationship between gender diversity in leadership representation and organizational performance through a mixed-method approach that integrates both primary and secondary data sources. Grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV), Upper Echelons Theory and Social Role Theory, the research explores how gender-inclusive leadership structures influence innovation, employee satisfaction, decision-making quality and financial outcomes.Primary data were collected through structured questionnaires administered to 180 mid and senior-level managers across the banking, manufacturing, education and service sectors in Nepal. Secondary data were obtained from organizational annual reports, national gender statistics and international databases such as UN Women, the World Economic Forum’s Global Gender Gap Report and the Asian Development Bank’s gender indicators. Using descriptive statistics, correlation and multiple regression analyses, the study reveals a significant positive association between gender diversity in leadership positions and organizational performance. Furthermore, organizations with inclusive gender policies demonstrated higher innovation capacity, stronger employee engagement and improved adaptability compared to those with limited female representation in decision-making roles.The findings provide robust empirical evidence supporting the strategic and ethical importance of gender diversity in management. The study contributes to the growing body of knowledge on diversity management in the Global South by contextualizing gender equity within South Asian corporate and socio-economic environments. Policy implications emphasize the need for institutional frameworks that foster gender-balanced leadership, promote inclusive organizational cultures and enhance competitiveness through diversity-driven innovation.
References
[1]Noland, M., Moran, T., & Kotschwar, B. (2016). Is gender diversity profitable? Evidence from a global survey (Working Paper 16-3). Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/documents/wp16-3.pdf
[2]Bussolo, M., Ezebuihe, J. A., Muñoz Boudet, A. M., Poupakis, S., Rahman, T., & Sarma, N. (2022). Social norms and gender equality: A descriptive analysis for South Asia (Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS 10142). World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-10142
[3]UN Women. (2021). Women’s leadership and participation in Nepal. UN Women Publications.
[4]Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x
[5]International Labour Organization. (2020). Women in business and management: The business case for change (2nd global report). ILO.
[6]ADB. (2021). Gender equality in South Asia: Policies, progress and prospects. Asian Development Bank.
[7]Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
[8]Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
[9]Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Erlbaum.
[10]Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955
[11]Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0319
[12]Chowdhury, S. (2020). Women in leadership in South Asia: Barriers and pathways. Journal of South Asian Studies, 35(2), 45–62.
[13]Catalyst. (2020). Why diversity and inclusion matter: Financial performance and innovation. Catalyst Research.
[14]Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 229–273. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667087
[15]Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
[16]Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
[17]APA. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). APA.
[18]World Economic Forum. (2022). Global gender gap report 2022. WEF.
[19]Li, T., & Mohammad, M. (2024). Gender Diversity and Leadership: Assessing Its Effect on Organisational Performance in Multinational Corporations in China. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 408–414. https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v3i2.44.2024
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Naresh Amatya (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.